Skip to content

Former Presidents?

Donald Trump claimed that “all” the former presidents knew that they should have built a border wall, and that “Some of them have told me that we should have done it.” But all the living ex-presidents have denied even talking to Trump about the wall.

So which presidents is Trump talking about? Here’s a good guess:


© Keith Knight

Incidentally, I linked the Trump quote to an article in People magazine with the title “President Trump Was Lying When He Said the Former Presidents Agreed About Building a Border Wall.” Who ever thought we’d see People magazine calling any president a liar?

Share

Declaration of Victory?

I may be way off base here, especially since I have not seen anyone else float this theory. But does anyone else think that maybe Donald Trump’s speech tonight will:

A. Declare a national emergency.
B. Order the military to build the wall across the southern border, and to use their money to pay for it.
C. End the shutdown.

If the military is going to build and fund the wall, then he doesn’t need the shutdown to force Congress to allocate money for it. So he gets to end the shutdown and (most importantly) save face.

It doesn’t matter if the courts (eventually) decide to block his fake national emergency. He will still declare victory tonight, which will satisfy his base. Even if he loses later, he can still claim that he tried everything, but it is all the fault of the Democrats.

It would not be the first time that Trump gave in, but declared victory anyway. And got away with it.

Share

Two Funny Things to Read

First, McSweeney’s has a hilarious article by Devorah Blachor. The title gives it all away: “I don’t hate women candidates — I just hated Hillary and coincidentally I’m starting to hate Elizabeth Warren”. But it is definitely worth a read.

The second article, by Vicky Alvear Shecter, also gives some of the punchline away: “What happened when a Trump supporter challenged me about The Wall”. But it gives a really good list of arguments about why building a wall is not just a stupid idea, but a really bad thing to do. The best part? All of the arguments are taken from conservative sources, complete with links.


© Nick Anderson

Share

All the Infographics We Need

A brilliant, if a bit long, comic by Scott Bateman. If you are being affected by the shut down, like many of us are, just remember all this. And also remember that Trump himself doesn’t even believe in his wall, it is just a way to fire up the base.

Whose Fault is The Shut Down?

Scott Bateman
Scott Bateman
Scott Bateman
Scott Bateman

Share

Exploring Warren

I was pleasantly surprised by Elizabeth Warren’s policy announcement.

Yes, I know that this was done in the context of announcing her formation of an presidential exploratory committee, but let’s ignore for a moment whether or not she would make a good president (I’ve seen more than enough of that, given that it mostly consists of juvenile name calling).

Ironically, Warren is essentially a defender of capitalism to me. Like Warren, I am a “capitalist to my bones” (I’ve started a number of companies and served as a CEO). But unlike the far right and some large corporations, I understand the important role that government plays in supporting capitalism by establishing and enforcing a level playing field. For example, Warren and I agree that monopolies are an anathema to vibrant capitalism. Competition is destroyed by companies that are “too big to fail” (and, as Warren put it, “too big to jail”). Without competition, capitalism becomes fascism.

I also agree that there are a few important functions that should not be organized under capitalist principles. For example, few people would argue that we should privatize our military, or our police and fire departments. Thus, I believe that the nature of health care makes a free market unsustainable (if you are in a serious car accident are you really going to shop around for the best value in health care? Of course not). So, I agree with Warren that “Medicare for all” would currently be the best solution.

I also believe that we should be striving for “equal opportunity” for all. It isn’t just that people deserve the opportunity to succeed. That’s important too, but the major point is that if the best and the brightest have an equal opportunity to raise to the top and enjoy success (like it was in the early days of the internet), then everyone wins. Or do you actually prefer an economy where the deck is stacked against you?

Back to the issue of name calling, I believe that the current American aristocracy must be scared witless by Elizabeth Warren, because she is challenging their privilege and power. Thus their attacks against her. Regardless of whether she becomes the next president, I think her positions and ideas deserve more discussion and implementation. That is, unless you actually believe that a few large corporations having all the power in this country is really the best we can do.


© Jen Sorensen

Sorensen says:

This cartoon, of course, references Grover Norquist’s famous line about wanting to reduce government to the size where he could drown it in a tub, like some unfortunate critter. One concept anti-government types aren’t too clear on is that waste is hardly unique to the public sector. I’m not saying government programs are necessarily more efficient than privately-run ones (although in the case of health care, public plans are massively more cost-effective). But money out of your pocket is money out of your pocket, whether it’s going to the guv’mint or a corporation.

Share

Arms Race?


© Lalo Alcaraz

It is amazing that anyone thinks that it is even possible to build a wall all the way across the southern border of the US. That’s just under 2000 miles long.

Even more amazing is that anyone believes that even if it is built, that this will stop illegal immigrants from entering the country. After all, the “iron curtain” or the Berlin wall were much shorter and built on easier terrain, but they ultimately failed.

And finally, a desire for a wall requires that you think immigrants are a bad idea. And yet, almost all the people who think they want a wall are the descendents of immigrants in the not-too-distant past.

Share

Everyone has an opinion!


© Tom Tomorrow

I assume that everyone reading this is just like Sparky the Penguin, am I right?

I think this comic captures a big difference between the Republicans and the Democrats. It seems to be true that almost all Republicans believe the holy “talking points” and repeat them endlessly. While Democrats all have their own opinions and endlessly argue amongst themselves.

Share

It’s a Wonderful Trump!

Merry Christmas from SNL:

Share

Dumb as a Rock

Who hires people like this?


© Nick Anderson

We did! We hired Donald Trump. And he hired a bunch of crooks and liars, just like himself.

If you really want to see someone as dumb as a rock, consider that Trump decided to hold a negotiating session on live TV with Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer. Which he not only lost badly, but he spent a bunch of time mansplaining to Pelosi. Yeah, that will surely win back women voters!

Next, Schumer set a simple trap for Trump and he fell for it. Yup, dumb as a rock.

But Trump is not just dumb. He even claimed that Mexico is going to pay for the wall. He’s either seriously delusional or he just can’t stop lying for a second.

Trump is going to shut down the government over funding for his wall. What a nice Christmas present for Americans.

Share

Ironic Immigration


© Jen Sorensen

Bad choices often come home to roost, but in this case, it is a vicious cycle where our reaction to a perceived problem just makes the problem worse.

Donald Trump rails against immigrants, both legal and illegal. But think about it a minute. Where are these migrants coming from? Mostly from the Middle East and Central America. Well, remember the Iran-Contra scandal where we sold arms to Iran (which was illegal) and used the profits to fund the Nicaraguan Contras in their fight to overthrow their government (also illegal)? As a side note, do you know who pardoned everyone involved in this sad affair? (Hint: he died recently.)

And then there was our invasion of Iraq in retaliation for 9/11 (which Iraq and Saddam Hussein had nothing to do with). And killing Muammar Al Gathafi. And funding Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan. And our invasion of Panama. And on and on.

So it was our actions that helped fuel the refugee crisis. Which led to politicians like Trump stoking fears about immigrants. But it isn’t limited to the US. The Brexit vote in the UK was driven by fear of immigrants. Nativist and populist politicians are increasing in power in many places around the world.

Another huge ironic aspect of this is the use of fear of disease to attack immigrants. Donald Trump said “Tremendous infectious disease is pouring across the border.”

But a new study published yesterday in the medical journal The Lancet argues that this is completely backwards. “There is no evidence to show that migrants are spreading disease. That is a false argument that is used to keep migrants out.” In general, immigrants are healthier than people in their host countries.

In addition — and this is really ironic — a large percentage of health care workers are immigrants. In the US, 29% of doctors and 24% of dentists were born elsewhere. According to the study, “Rather than being a burden, migrants are more likely to bolster services by providing medical care, teaching children, caring for older people, and supporting understaffed services.”

Even if it were true that migrants were more likely to be diseased, our current actions seem intentionally designed to make the situation worse. The Trump administration is trying to make it more difficult for legal immigrants to get green cards if they have ever used Medicaid. Studies have shown that even legal immigrants are already afraid to sign up for public benefits because they are afraid they will be deported. According to the American Medical Association and the American Hospital Association, this will cost US taxpayers more as immigrants avoid getting health care and end up getting sicker than they otherwise would. If we are really concerned about the bad health of immigrants, wouldn’t it make more sense to make sure they have proper medical care?

Of course, we do have an example of immigrants bringing in “tremendous infectious disease”, but it happened hundreds of years ago. When Europeans “discovered” America, they brought with them smallpox, bubonic plague, chickenpox, cholera, diphtheria, malaria, measles, scarlet fever, tuberculosis, typhoid, typhus, whooping cough, even influenza and the common cold.

In the US, these diseases killed up to half of all Native Americans, and many smaller tribes went extinct. In Florida alone, the population of Native Americans dropped from 700,000 to 2000, a death rate of 99.7%. In Mexico, around 25 million indigenous people died due to introduced disease, which has been described as “the greatest genocide in the history of man.” And despite advances in medicine, we still suffer from most of these diseases.

But even if foreign germs were something to fear today, eliminating immigration entirely now wouldn’t make us any safer at all, because the vast majority of people moving across our borders are not immigrants (they are things like business people and tourists). And it wouldn’t stop diseases that come in other ways, like via rats on cargo ships or birds that easily fly over any wall.

And of course, even if it made any sense to stop immigration, building Trump’s wall wouldn’t stop enough immigrants to make any difference at all. After all, a wall wouldn’t stop immigrants coming in by sea, or who use underground tunnels. And according to people who smuggle in illegal immigrants, there are always border agents or customs officials who are willing to take a bribe and look the other way. And The Wall wouldn’t stop drug smuggling either, as most illegal drugs come in through ports of entry, not where the wall would be built.

If we are really worried about our safety, we would spend the ridiculous amount of money the wall would cost us on providing better health care.

But maybe the politicians who complain about immigration don’t really care if they stop it. After all, if they did that, they wouldn’t have anyone on whom to blame everything, and nobody would vote for them.

Share

More than a Laughing Matter?

It sure looks like Donald Trump fell into a trap set by Robert Mueller. But that won’t stop Trump from continuing to lie over and over, digging his legal grave even deeper.

I love how Don Lemon can’t stop laughing about the situation. It is pretty funny that the thing that will probably bring Trump down is the incompetence of Trump himself and all those “best people” he surrounded himself with. People like Michael Cohen and Paul Manafort.


© Michael Andrew

Share

Fair and Balanced?


© Jen Sorensen

It’s true. After the 2016 presidential election all of the news media wanted to know how they were so wrong in assuming that Donald Trump had no chance of becoming president. I’m not sure why. Heck, even Trump himself was surprised that he was elected.

The author of this comic, Jen Sorensen, commented on her own comic:

While I’ve seen some news stories about women voters, there’s been nowhere near the same adulation and obsessive fawning as there was over male Trump voters in 2016. The very notion of “authenticity” is gendered male, and Dem-voting women are not seen as “real” Americans by many in the media.

Now that the 2018 election resulted in a huge 40 seat gain for Democrats in the House of Representatives, are the media trying to figure out who all these people are who voted that way? Of course not, because they expected a blue wave for the Democrats. We even saw some of the opposite, with media initially saying that the expected wave didn’t materialize. It is all about expectations.

Of course, we never expected Trump to admit that the Democrats romped all over the Republicans in the 2018 election. Unlike Barack Obama, who after the 2010 midterm elections admitted that the Republicans had given his party a “shellacking”.

Share

Safety and Liberty

In 1775, Benjamin Franklin famously wrote, “They who can give up essential Liberty to obtain a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.”

We should all remember that when we consider the actions and words of Donald Trump this Thanksgiving weekend, when he attacked the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals because they would not give him what he wanted on immigration policy. But he didn’t just attack the decision, he attacked the whole court:

Judges must not Legislate Security and Safety at the Border, or anywhere else. They know nothing about it and are making our Country unsafe.

There’s that safety word. Trump continued:

It is out of control, has a horrible reputation, is overturned more than any Circuit in the Country, 79%, & is used to get an almost guaranteed result.

According to PolitiFact, the Ninth Circuit is not overturned more than any Circuit in the country. The Sixth circuit has that honor, with 87%.

The decision Trump is complaining about says that he cannot bar immigrants who enter the US illegally from seeking asylum. The decision cites federal laws that make Trump’s decision unlawful.

So this is a two-fer. Trump is claiming that he can violate laws passed by Congress to do whatever he wants. And in addition, that courts can’t question his orders because they relate to safety.

But wait, there’s more. Trump continues:

Our great Law Enforcement professionals MUST BE ALLOWED TO DO THEIR JOB! If not there will be only bedlam, chaos, injury and death. We want the Constitution as written!

It sounds like he is also proposing a police state.

Ironically, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, John Roberts, disagreed with Trump’s opinion about the Constitution. So what did Trump do? He attacked Roberts. Doubly ironically, in order to overturn the decision of the Ninth Circuit court, it would need to be reviewed by the Supreme Court, so pissing off the Chief Justice may not help Trump’s case.

When did Trump become a dictator? (Answer: when politics crossed a penis and a potato. Get it?)

Share

Lock Her Up?

Donald Trump continues to lead his devoted followers in chants of “Lock her up!” at his rallies, because Hillary Clinton famously used private email for government business while she was secretary of state. So of course, we now find out that Ivanka Trump has been using a personal email account for government business. Ivanka used a Microsoft email account to communicate with Cabinet officials, White House aides, and others.

And it isn’t just Ivanka of course. The people in the Trump administration who have also used private email for government business include her father, the president, Steve Bannon, Reince Priebus, Gary Cohn, and Stephen Miller.

My favorite part is that the White House responded by pointing out that, as opposed to Hillary Clinton, Ivanka Trump never set up a private server. However, breaking into a public email server is far easier than breaking into a private server.


© Nomi Kane

Share

Supreme Family

Some readers may have a problem with this one. And I admit that I still think that Brett Kavanaugh should not have been confirmed to the Supreme Court, even more because of what he did during his confirmation than what he did back in high school.

But now that he is on the Supreme Court, I agree with Sonia Sotomayor. The last thing we need is a Supreme Court that is so partisan that they disintegrate into factions. In an interview with David Axelrod (who was Chief Strategist for Barack Obama’s presidential campaigns) Sotormayor said that Kavanaugh was welcomed into the Supreme Court “family”.

When you’re charged with working together for most of the remainder of your life, you have to create a relationship. The nine of us are now a family and we’re a family with each of us our own burdens and our own obligations to others, but this is our work family, and it’s just as important as our personal family. We’ve probably spent more time with each other than most justices spend, who have spouses, with their spouses.

It was Justice [Clarence] Thomas who tells me that when he first came to the Court, another justice approached him and said, “I judge you by what you do here. Welcome.” And I repeated that story to Justice Kavanaugh when I first greeted him here.

Conservative, liberal, those are political terms. Do I suspect that I might be dissenting a bit more? Possibly, but I still have two relatively new colleagues, one very new colleague, Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch. And we’ve agreed in quite a few cases, we’ve disagreed in a bunch, But you know, let’s see.

We all have families we love, we all care about others, we care about our country, and we care when people are injured. And unfortunately, the current conversation often forgets that. It forgets our commonalities and focuses on superficial differences whether those are language or how people look or the same God they pray to but in different ways. Those differences truly are not important. What is important is those human values we share and those human feelings that we share. But I worry that we forget about that too often.

Share