Skip to content

Trump goes into Siege Mode?

Donald Trump is going off the deep end over the whole Trump University scandal and lawsuit.

As if calling the judge in two of the cases against Trump U “a hater” and saying that the judge should be removed from the case because “he’s a Mexican” isn’t bad enough. First of all, the judge is not Mexican. He was born in Indiana, the son of immigrants from Mexico who came to this country in the 1920s. But reality doesn’t matter to Trump. And attacking someone because their parents came from another country makes Trump completely against everything for which this country stands. Indeed, in his view, would any American be qualified to judge Donald Trump?

Even Trump’s strongest supporters, including Republican politicians being considered for the VP slot, denounced Trump. Newt Gingrich called his racist attacks “inexcusable” and said “I don’t know what Trump’s reasoning was, and I don’t care. His description of the judge in terms of his parentage is completely unacceptable.” Top Trump campaigner Ben Carson warned “Every human being is an individual first rather than a member of an identity group. The moment we forget that is the moment we enter into a phase of moral descent.” Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell said “I couldn’t disagree [with Trump] more.” Speaker Paul Ryan called it “the textbook definition of a racist comment“. GOP Senator Jeff Flake says “Let’s face it: meet the old Trump, just like the new Trump. We’ve got what we’ve got. That’s not somebody who can win the White House.” Senator Lindsay Graham accused Trump of “playing the race card”. Graham is urging Republicans to rescind their endorsements of Trump, saying “This is the most un-American thing from a politician since Joe McCarthy. If anybody was looking for an off-ramp, this is probably it. There’ll come a time when the love of country will trump hatred of Hillary.”

The only people who have praised Trump for his disgusting comments are prominent white nationalists.

But that is not what this post is about. Unbelievably, Trump has now ordered his campaign surrogates (including former Arizona Governor Jan Brewer, former Senator Scott Brown, and current Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi, who asked for and received $25,000 in campaign contributions from Trump and then refused to investigate complaints into Trump University) to join him in attacking the judge and to impugn reporters as racists. He says, “The people asking the questions—those are the racists. I would go at ’em.”

But when Brewer informed Trump that his own campaign had ordered the surrogates to stop talking about the lawsuit, Trump immediately started attacking his own campaign staff, and told the surrogates to “Take that order and throw it the hell out”. He then asked “Are there any other stupid letters that were sent to you folks? That’s one of the reasons I want to have this call, because you guys are getting sometimes stupid information from people that aren’t so smart.”

So much for hiring the “best people” for his campaign.

Trump wants his supporters and surrogates to attack anyone who asks questions about his fraudulent university and to call them racists. And on the call he boasted “We will overcome. I’ve always won and I’m going to continue to win. And that’s the way it is.”

But in the five weeks since he became the presumptive Republican nominee, Trump has failed several times: he refused to release his tax returns, lying that he couldn’t because he was being audited; he denied that it was him on a recorded phone call pretending to be his own publicist and bragging about himself; he failed to donate to veterans groups as he promised until pressured by the media; and after promising that he would self-fund his campaign so he couldn’t be bought, he is now working with multiple super-PACs and courting billionaire donors; and of course his Trump University scandal and resulting racism.

His warlord-like siege mentality is a preview of what a Trump presidency would look like, and it scares the hell out of me. Trump has the potential to destroy America, ruin our economy, incite racial violence, dramatically increase corruption, sink the dollar, bankrupt our government, alienate our allies and trade partners, increase the nuclear threat, and invite terrorist attacks with his hostile rhetoric.

UPDATE: Let’s add that — according to Fox News’ Megyn Kelly — Trump’s attacks on the judge in his trial could destroy our legal system.

Share

Hawking Trump

[Satire reprinted from The New Yorker. Here’s what Hawking actually said.]

Stephen Hawking Angers Trump Supporters With Baffling Array of Long Words

by Andy Borowitz

LONDON (The Borowitz Report)—The theoretical physicist Stephen Hawking angered supporters of Donald J. Trump on Monday by responding to a question about the billionaire with a baffling array of long words.

Speaking to a television interviewer in London, Hawking called Trump “a demagogue who seems to appeal to the lowest common denominator,” a statement that many Trump supporters believed was intentionally designed to confuse them.

Moments after Hawking made the remark, Google reported a sharp increase in searches for the terms “demagogue,” “denominator,” and “Stephen Hawking.”

“For a so-called genius, this was an epic fail,” Trump’s campaign manager, Corey Lewandowski, said. “If Professor Hawking wants to do some damage, maybe he should try talking in English next time.”

Later in the day, Hawking attempted to clarify his remark about the presumptive Republican Presidential nominee, telling a reporter, “Trump bad man. Real bad man.”

Share

The Ironic Path of Sanders

After the AP called the Democratic nomination for Clinton, the Sanders campaign released a statement:

It is unfortunate that the media, in a rush to judgement, are ignoring the Democratic National Committee’s clear statement that it is wrong to count the votes of superdelegates before they actually vote at the convention this summer.

Now, I happen to agree with Sanders on this one, but it still strikes me as hypocritical of his campaign to invoke the DNC, after all the times that Sanders (and his supporters and campaign) have accused the DNC (and especially its chair, Debbie Wasserman Schultz) of rigging the election for Clinton.

In addition, Sanders has now said he will win by talking Democratic superdelegates into changing sides, in many cases defying the will of the voters in their home states. His campaign has declared that its “job from now until the convention is to convince superdelegates that Bernie is by far the strongest candidate against Donald Trump.”

What happened to the “Democratic” in “Democratic Socialist”?

Yes, I know that Sanders’ statements are likely political posturing, but it still strikes me as strongly contrary to Bernie’s principles and values, which was his whole appeal. And that’s sad.

It is also pointless. According to FiveThirtyEight.com, there actually “isn’t much sign of forward momentum for Sanders”. He had a “strong run of states in late March and early April, but over the past seven weeks, from the New York primary on April 19 through Puerto Rico on Sunday, Clinton has won 505 pledged delegates compared with 428 for Sanders. Her current lead in our national polling average, 14.4 percentage points, is the widest it has been since mid-February.”

And Clinton is gaining superdelegates, not losing them. How can Bernie talk superdelegates into switching, after he has spent months attacking them?

Finally, by continuing to attack Clinton, Sanders is hurting his chances of influencing the Democratic Party platform. And that’s sad too.

UPDATE: Politico has an inside look at Bernie Sanders’ campaign, and how Sanders himself is making all the big decisions, including the ones that have hurt his campaign and incited anger among his supporters. It is fascinating, and answers some of the questions asked in this post.

Share

Vote!

If you live in one of the states that has a primary today, please vote. I don’t even care for whom you vote. People complain about the special interests in politics, but the main reason those special interests can get away with it is because most people don’t vote.

Ignore the AP calling the primary for Clinton. Their prediction is based entirely on superdelegates, while the pledged delegates are far more important.

Vote for Clinton or vote for Sanders. Vote for whomever you want. The only wasted vote is one you don’t cast. I don’t even care if you vote for Trump, since all of his opponents have dropped out.

Just vote. If you don’t vote, you don’t get to complain.

Share

Our Continuing Education from Trump U

When Donald Trump created Trump University, he called it a noble endeavor with an emphasis on education over profits. In fact, he promised that if the (fake) university made a profit, he would turn the funds over to charity.

Is anyone surprised to find out that even though Trump University had revenues of $40 million and netted an estimated $5 million in profit, not a penny of that ever went to charity?

And as already noted, Trump somehow got the Texas attorney general (who is now the governor) to mysteriously drop a lawsuit against Trump University, and then donated $35,000 to his gubernatorial campaign.

And for even more examples of Trump fraud, see what John Oliver has to say about Trump University.

Share

Late Night Political Humor

[Jokes from May 19, 2016]

“One of the ways that Trump is treating the convention like a reality show is holding off announcing his running mate. As one Trumpling said, ‘Announcing the vice-presidential nominee before the convention is like announcing the winner of ‘Celebrity Apprentice’ before the final show is on the air.’ It’s an apt metaphor, because this year’s Republican convention will be the series finale of America.” – Stephen Colbert

“The New York Times just did a big profile on Donald Trump, and revealed that he has life-sized portraits of Ronald Reagan and John Wayne at his campaign headquarters. And if you don’t see them right away, it’s because they’re right behind a 25-foot tall portrait of Donald Trump.” – Jimmy Fallon

“Ed Rendell tried to help Hillary Clinton by attacking her opponent, saying, ‘Trump’s comments, like ‘you can’t be a 10 if you’re flat-chested,’ will come back to haunt him.’ And then Rendell helpfully added, ‘There are probably more ugly women in America than attractive women. People take that stuff personally.’ Yep, I have a feeling a lot of women are about to take that really personally.” – Stephen Colbert

“Despite her promises to be tough on Wall Street, a new report has found that groups supporting Hillary Clinton have received $25 million from the financial industry using so-called shadow banks. Meanwhile, Bernie Sanders has received a new waffle iron for opening a savings account.” – Seth Meyers

“Vice President Joe Biden today urged Americans to have an uncomfortable conversation about race relations. And he would know, because he’s had lots of them.” – Seth Meyers

“The National Parks Service is so desperate for cash that they just announced that, for the first time, they are going to solicit corporate sponsorship. Pretty soon, those sequoias could be brought to you by Viagra. Remember, if your redwood lasts more than 2,000 years, call your lumberjack!” – Stephen Colbert

Share

Racists, Bigots, and Trump

There are many theories of why people support Donald Trump. One theory is that the voters are angry and hate the political establishment. Middle class workers have been hurt by the economy and are desperate to find someone who can shake things up. Or at least stand up to the special interests who are sucking our country dry for their own benefit. For example, an article in The New Yorker summed up Trump’s appeal this way:

The base of the [Republican] Party, the middle-aged white working class, has suffered at least as much as any demographic group because of globalization, low-wage immigrant labor, and free trade. Trump sensed the rage that flared from this pain and made it the fuel of his campaign.

But a detailed analysis of the 2016 American National Election Study has a simpler explanation. First, the analysis found that there is little correlation between how people feel about the state of the economy and whether they support Trump.

What the analysis found was surprising, but ultimately already right in front of our eyes. If people answer yes to the following two questions, there is a (stunning) 94% probability that they are a Trump voter:

  1. Are you white?
  2. Do you believe Barack Obama is a Muslim?

The next best predictors are the person’s level of resentment toward blacks, and whether they feel that Muslims are “violent”.

That’s right. You can predict (with 94% accuracy) whether someone is a Donald Trump supporter by determining if they agree with racist statements and (slightly delusional) racist theories about the president.

The analysis also found a strong correlation between racial resentment and how much they disapprove of the job Obama is doing as president. This in turn leads to a strong correlation between a person’s job approval rating for Obama, and whether they support Hillary Clinton. These correlations hold true regardless of how people feel about the economy.

Indeed, because racist statements and actions can be socially unacceptable, it appears that people use statements about the economy as a (more acceptable) proxy for expressing their racist feelings.

The more things change, the more they stay the same.

Share

White Entitlement?

I’ve been having conversations recently with Bernie Sanders supporters and have felt a kind of desperation coming from them. Like if Sanders doesn’t win (and most of them are still holding out hope for that unlikely outcome) they will be very depressed or angry. Some are saying that they plan to vote for Trump if Sanders doesn’t get the nomination, and many of them are saying that they just won’t vote.

It isn’t like I don’t understand. I feel depressed and angry when I think about Donald Trump becoming president. Ironically, the Sanders supporters I’ve talked to all admit that Trump is much worse than Clinton, but that doesn’t seem to matter.

Is the prospect of Hillary Clinton becoming president really that horrible? Up until two years ago, Bill Clinton was the favorite president of most Democrats. But recently his popularity has been slipping. What’s going on?

But today I read an interesting article by Barrett Holmes Pitner titled “The White Entitlement of Some Sanders Supporters“. Now, Pitner is a Sanders supporter and even interned for Sanders. But he is noticing the same things I have — Sanders supporters trash talking Clinton, talking about how “Killary Clinton” has stolen the nomination, that she is cheating, and that she can’t be trusted. But Pitner has a theory:

The main source of their frustration was merely the fact that they had lost. The fact that she is ahead in the popular vote, has won more primaries and caucuses, and has earned more delegates was to them a minor nuisance. They had their absurd talking points and were unwilling to deviate into reality.

The more I reflected on them, the more I realized the key point: They felt entitled to win, and a defeat meant that someone must have cheated or that their opinions did not matter, which of course couldn’t be true. They preferred to suspend reality and fabricate injustices rather than concede that Sanders has lost fair and square.

Essentially, we disagreed on what America supposedly promised or owed us. They felt success was promised to them. The entitlement to believe that you should always win allowed them to overlook how the system in many ways has always been unjustly rigged in their favor because they’re white.

This could explain why Sanders supporters are predominantly white, while most minority voters favor Clinton. Could it be that Sanders (if even unintentionally) is benefiting from the same white tribalism that appears to be the driving force behind Trump’s appeal?

Well, I expect some of my readers to strongly disagree with this idea. I’m not even totally convinced of it, but so far it is the only explanation I’ve heard that makes any sense.

Share

Trump Attacks Trump

Steven Rosenthal and Peggy O’Brien took 142 audio clips from 37 different Trump interviews and edited them together to solve the mystery of what would happen if Donald Trump attacked Donald Trump (like he has attacked anyone he doesn’t like or who threatens his ascension to the presidency). Because ultimately, Trump himself may be the only person who can stop Trump.

Share

Good Egg

Bernie Sanders responded to the anti-Trump violence on Thursday with a statement that bears repeating:

I understand how reprehensible and disgraceful Donald Trump’s positions are, how ignorant they are, how much he is appealing — and I can understand the anger, I surely can. The bigotry that is coming from his mouth, the insults to the Mexican community, the Latino community and the Muslim community, and women, and African-Americans, and veterans. I understand the anger.

But we are not going to defeat Trump, you know, by throwing eggs or getting involved in violence of any kind. We defeat Trump when we stand together as one people and fight for a progressive agenda.

The only thing I would have added is to point out not just the insults to protesters, but the violence that has been committed against protesters (and encouraged by Trump). The media reports seem to be focusing exclusively on violence against Trump supporters, but at a Trump rally in San Diego last week, Trump supporters pepper-sprayed non-violent protesters in the face. And we’ve all seen the video of a Trump supporter who sucker-punched a protester who was already in custody. Unfortunately, it looks like violence against his supporters is exactly what Trump wants. I hope our side can show more restraint.

Share

The Art of the Deal

Dan Wasserman
© Dan Wasserman

The ironic thing about being conned is that you don’t know you are being conned until it is too late.

Share

The Continuing Scam of Veterans

Some people might argue that the Trump University scandal is old news. That Donald Trump did that back when he was a businessman, so it was ok to swindle people out of their money for his own enrichment. But if he becomes president, he will be our scumbag swindler, using his evil powers to make America great again (whatever the hell that means).

And yet, even now, Trump continues to con people. Remember when he decided to skip one of the Republican debates because Fox News had been mean to him? He held a “fund raiser for veterans” instead, which he claimed had raised $6 million dollars. Then the Washington Post checked into it, and found that far less had actually been disbursed to veterans groups.

So caught lying by the media, Trump did what he always does — he demonized the messenger and called them names. But as Trump had made support for veterans a cornerstone of his campaign, he was caught red handed, so he was forced to make good on his lie.

And for good measure, he had to come up with another lie. He claimed that they hadn’t disbursed the money because they had to vet all the veterans groups before they could give them money. Really? I would think that most large charities are pretty well known by now. But Trump insisted, saying “You have to go through a process. When you send checks for hundreds of thousands of dollars to people and to companies and to groups that you’ve never heard of, charitable organizations, you have to vet it. You send people out, you do a lot of work.”

But here’s the best part. Let’s assume that Trump was not lying, and that his people (you know, the best people) were working very hard vetting these groups. Who did they come up with?

Well, it turns out that at least one of the veteran’s groups that received money from Trump is itself a sham. The “Foundation for American Veterans” has an “F” (fail) rating from CharityWatch.

Why? Because that supposed charity spent only a small fraction of its budget, you know, actually helping veterans. The rest went to executive salaries, fundraising, and a quarter of their entire budget was spent on “other expenses”. For all we know, that money was used to pay off people. (Wouldn’t it be great to find out that Trump used the veteran’s money to pay off the three people he got to say nice things about Trump University?)

What’s more, the Better Business Bureau issued an alert just this year against the charity, because of a “high volume of complaints and customer reviews”, and charges that people received “harassing phone calls” from them. As Trump might say, “real beauties”.

That’s what veterans get when Trump carefully vets charities for them: Used as political pawns and then screwed.

Share

University of Scams

The evidence is building that at best, Trump is a charming con man who has hit upon the ultimate con: getting himself elected as the leader of the free world (with his finger on the nuclear trigger).

I’ve been watching the unfolding scandal around “Trump University”, whose very name is itself a scam. Calling an educational program a “university” without going through an accreditation process is like calling yourself a medical doctor without going to medical school. It is illegal. As the Attorney General of New York puts it “It’s fraud. This is straight up fraud.

And Trump knows it is fraud because he has tried to reach an out-of-court settlement in the case, despite the fact that he has loudly proclaimed that he “never settles” cases. More lies.

Trump has now doubled down by fighting allegations of fraud with more fraud. The Trump campaign released a video “The Truth About Trump University” featuring three former students saying they benefited greatly from their courses there. Trump has claimed that 98% of the people who attended liked the school. However, the three students featured in the video are all beholden to Trump through business and personal connections, and none of them are actually in the real estate business, which was the subject matter of Trump University. One of the three even claims in the video that “because of Trump University I ultimately enrolled in 2007 in the Wharton Business School.” Sounds great, but it turns out that he was never enrolled as a student there, he just attended a two-week seminar held by the school. This same guy has often described himself as an alumnus of the prestigious business school. I wonder where he learned to misrepresent himself and lie like this?

But what I’m really curious about is, will any of this make Trump supporters realize that they are being conned?

Trump claims to be an expert deal-maker who will make America great again by negotiating better deals for us. But many of his “deals” have been transparent frauds that only seem to have benefitted Trump himself. Are world leaders really so stupid and gullible that they will fall for that?

Share

Primary Paralysis

Tom Tomorrow
© Tom Tomorrow

So, when reading this did you find yourself agreeing with all the panels, except the ones that criticize your side? Hopefully, it won’t be too long before we look back at this whole mess and laugh (or yawn).

Well, either that or we’ll be kicking ourselves because we have to live with President Trump.

Share

Late Night Political Humor

[Jokes from May 18, 2016]

“Megyn Kelly interviewed Donald Trump last night. The important thing is that wounds have been healed, which is good. It was difficult to watch Donald and her fight. It’s hard to watch a fight between two people with such similar hair styles.” – Jimmy Kimmel

“Fox News host Megyn Kelly addressed rumors about Donald Trump’s hair in a new interview and said, ‘It’s not a wig and it’s not a comb-over, either.’ So, what is it? It’s a mystery, wrapped in a riddle, inside an enigma.” – Seth Meyers

“Last night, Fox premiered its new reality dating show ‘Coupled’. I watched it for ten minutes and I thought, these two are not going to make it. Then I realized I was watching the Megyn Kelly-Donald Trump interview.” – Jimmy Fallon

“A new poll has 87 percent of Republicans supporting Trump. The other 13 percent are currently standing on bridges looking vacantly into the distance.” – Stephen Colbert

“It seems Donald Trump is integrating himself into the Republican Party establishment, and making amends with those he steamrolled during the race, including the increasingly sleepy Dr. Ben Carson.” – Jimmy Kimmel

“He is slowly unifying the Republican Party. All it took was no other options.” – Stephen Colbert

“In a recent interview, ‘Shark Tank’ host Mark Cuban predicted that if Donald Trump is elected, it would be bad news for Wall Street. And in related news, Donald Trump just got endorsed by Bernie Sanders.” – Jimmy Fallon

“On the Democratic side, Bernie Sanders won Oregon. It’s funny with Oregon. If recreational marijuana is legal in your state, you can pretty much guarantee Bernie will win it.” – Jimmy Kimmel

“Bernie Sanders won last night’s Oregon Democratic primary and this was a surprise. Hillary came in third — behind a bag of weed.” – Seth Meyers

“In last night’s Democratic primaries in Oregon and Kentucky, Bernie won Oregon. No surprise there. If you look at it on a map, Oregon is pretty much as far left as you can get.” – Stephen Colbert

“So Clinton won Kentucky and Sanders won Oregon, and now this will be settled by whose supporters can be most annoying on Facebook. Good luck, everybody.” – Jimmy Kimmel

“Meanwhile, in Kentucky, Hillary Clinton declared victory after winning by less than 1 percent. So there’s another 1 percent for Bernie to be mad at.” – Stephen Colbert

“Democrats are concerned that Sanders’ campaign could alienate enough voters to hand Donald Trump the election. Bernie said, ‘Listen, I’m 74 years old. I’m surrounded by college girls screaming my name. Don’t ruin this for me.'” – Jimmy Kimmel

Share