I think Bush Sr. had it right when he called it “Voodoo Economics”. But he too fell sway to the dark side.
-
‹ Home
Info
-
Subscribe
-
Users
Links
- All Hat No Cattle
- Andy Borowitz
- Axios
- Barry Deutsch
- Bearman Cartoons
- Beau of the Fifth Column
- Capitol Steps
- Cook Political Report
- Crooks and Liars
- Daily Kos Comics
- Daily Show
- David Horsey
- Derf City
- Digby
- Eclectablog
- Electoral Vote
- Fair and Unbalanced
- Fark Politics
- Five Thirty Eight Politics
- Funny or Die
- Funny Times
- Go Comics
- Hackwhackers
- Heather Cox Richardson
- HuffPost Comedy
- John Fugelsang
- Kung Foo Monkey
- Last Week Tonight
- Margaret and Helen
- Mark Fiore
- Matt Davies
- Matt Wuerker
- McClatchy Cartoons
- News of the Weird
- O'Carl's Law
- Politicususa
- PolitiFact
- Propaganda Professor
- Raging Pencils
- Randy Rainbow
- RCP Cartoons
- Saturday Night Live
- Slowpoke
- Stonekettle Station
- Ted Rall
- The Nib
- The Onion
- Tom the Dancing Bug
- Tom Toles
- USN Political Cartoons
- What Now Toons
-
Tags
Abortion Bush Campaign Finance Cheney Climate Clinton Congress Conservatives Corporations Corruption Deficits Democrats Drugs Economy Education Election Elections Energy Environment Fox News Gays Guns Health Immigration Lies McCain Media Middle East Obama Palin Protests Racism Religion Republicans Romney Spying Supreme Court Taxes Tea Party Terrorism Terrorists Torture Trump Unemployment War
-
Archives
You are Visitor #
2 Comments
Supply side economics is a discredited theory with no noticeable academic support and results that are questionable at best. The only time it even appears to have worked is under Reagan, and I believe the economic recovery under Reagan had more to do with the ending of the cold war, for which he rightly gets the credit, and the explosive growth of the microcomputer (IBM PC launched in 1980) which his policies had nothing to do with whatsoever.
Targeted tax credits to incentivize specific growth investments have been proven to work – and work well. Reducing general tax rates when the rates are confiscatory (more than 50%) has a positive impact but it’s small in comparison.
Republicans do believe in magic, and they have a dictionary where all the words we use in politics (facts, compromise, etc.) have alernate definitions.
Or they simply reject words entirely. Mostly because a lot of people have come to see the word in its least flattering form.
http://www.npr.org/2011/07/19/138468870/what-the-word-compromise-really-means