-
‹ Home
Info
-
Subscribe
-
Users
Links
- All Hat No Cattle
- Andy Borowitz
- Axios
- Barry Deutsch
- Bearman Cartoons
- Beau of the Fifth Column
- Capitol Steps
- Cook Political Report
- Crooks and Liars
- Daily Kos Comics
- Daily Show
- David Horsey
- Derf City
- Digby
- Eclectablog
- Electoral Vote
- Fair and Unbalanced
- Fark Politics
- Five Thirty Eight Politics
- Funny or Die
- Funny Times
- Go Comics
- Hackwhackers
- Heather Cox Richardson
- HuffPost Comedy
- John Fugelsang
- Kung Foo Monkey
- Last Week Tonight
- Margaret and Helen
- Mark Fiore
- Matt Davies
- Matt Wuerker
- McClatchy Cartoons
- News of the Weird
- O'Carl's Law
- Politicususa
- PolitiFact
- Propaganda Professor
- Raging Pencils
- Randy Rainbow
- RCP Cartoons
- Saturday Night Live
- Slowpoke
- Stonekettle Station
- Ted Rall
- The Nib
- The Onion
- Tom the Dancing Bug
- Tom Toles
- USN Political Cartoons
- What Now Toons
-
Tags
Abortion Bush Campaign Finance Cheney Climate Clinton Congress Conservatives Corporations Corruption Deficits Democrats Drugs Economy Education Election Elections Energy Environment Fox News Gays Guns Health Immigration Lies McCain Media Middle East Obama Palin Protests Racism Religion Republicans Romney Spying Supreme Court Taxes Tea Party Terrorism Terrorists Torture Trump Unemployment War
-
Archives
You are Visitor #
3 Comments
This feeling they seem to be having about how America has “lost the presumption of innocence in our legal system” is one I’ve had for a few years now….
The legal presumption of innocence remains, but the presumption has certainly disappeared in the media, especially given the impotence of gagging orders that are supposed to effect name suppression for the accused; just look at the trouble that ‘super injunctions’ in the UK have in dealing with Twitter.
Legal repercussions might be reserved until guilt has been proven, but the damage to reputation is done as soon as charges are laid, served by the media’s thirst for scandal and so increased copy.
What I find interesting about the French (media) response is that they have their panties in a bunch about the perp walk photos arguing that it will bias a jury. At the same time, they find no problem with publishing the name and other private details about the (alleged) victim. I’m not sure what to make of that, but it does comport with my experience with French intellectuals who have perfected the most incredible mental acrobatics to justify whatever they want to believe, even if two conclusions are ultimately contradictory.