More on the “circle of life“:
-
‹ Home
Info
-
Subscribe
-
Users
Links
- All Hat No Cattle
- Andy Borowitz
- Axios
- Barry Deutsch
- Bearman Cartoons
- Beau of the Fifth Column
- Capitol Steps
- Cook Political Report
- Crooks and Liars
- Daily Kos Comics
- Daily Show
- David Horsey
- Derf City
- Digby
- Eclectablog
- Electoral Vote
- Fair and Unbalanced
- Fark Politics
- Five Thirty Eight Politics
- Funny or Die
- Funny Times
- Go Comics
- Hackwhackers
- Heather Cox Richardson
- HuffPost Comedy
- John Fugelsang
- Kung Foo Monkey
- Last Week Tonight
- Margaret and Helen
- Mark Fiore
- Matt Davies
- Matt Wuerker
- McClatchy Cartoons
- News of the Weird
- O'Carl's Law
- Politicususa
- PolitiFact
- Propaganda Professor
- Raging Pencils
- Randy Rainbow
- RCP Cartoons
- Saturday Night Live
- Slowpoke
- Stonekettle Station
- Ted Rall
- The Nib
- The Onion
- Tom the Dancing Bug
- Tom Toles
- USN Political Cartoons
- What Now Toons
-
Tags
Abortion Bush Campaign Finance Cheney Climate Clinton Congress Conservatives Corporations Corruption Deficits Democrats Drugs Economy Education Election Elections Energy Environment Fox News Gays Guns Health Immigration Lies McCain Media Middle East Obama Palin Protests Racism Religion Republicans Romney Spying Supreme Court Taxes Tea Party Terrorism Terrorists Torture Trump Unemployment War
-
Archives
You are Visitor #
4 Comments
I’m starting to see a strong narrative in place. The story goes like this:
“People (presumably right-wingers) in high and low places who once touted ‘small government’ are now flip-flopping and calling for government intervention in light of the oil spill. Also, they are blaming Obama for it.”
Long story short: everyone on the right is a hypocrite and a cheap-shooter.
Am I the only one that feels that this narrative – which seems to be quickly saturating the left – not only goes too far in oversimplifying things, but also paints a picture that doesn’t necessarily exist on the scale that it would have us subscribe to?
For instance, I’ve often found that if you want to illustrate “hypocrisy” amongst ideological lines, all you have to do is show one Republican representative saying one thing, and then show any given Republican representative saying something that opposes the first viewpoint, preferably months or years after the first statement was made.
The inherent flaw in this kind of presentation is that although it can be a clear example of hypocrisy when you show the exact same individual making contradicting statements (given that the full context of each statement is understood), using examples of different people registered with the same party is a highly effective yet substantially poor substitute.
With that in mind, I’d like to see some real examples that support the current narrative. Bonus points if they don’t rely on clips from Fox News. (I think we know by now that they neither represent a coherent body of views nor do they hold themselves to make statements which reflect thought and reason. They’ll basically say or suggest anything on the fly as long as it has a chance of stirring the pot.)
It seems like you are doing the same thing that you are complaining about. I’ve never said or even thought that everyone on the right is a hypocrite. What I do believe is that the current political strategy of opposing every single thing Obama does is leading followers of that strategy to do and say more than their share of hypocritical things. This is just one example of it.
I’m confused by your response – you don’t need to defend yourself. It sounds like you’re taking my observations as a criticism of your individual activity, but when I say “narrative” I definitely mean one that exists between the lines across the board, not, say, the narrative of politicalirony.com. I apologize if it sounded that way, but what I’m referring to isn’t something that’s coming from you, just something that’s more or less “out there.”
These cartoons, for instance. You didn’t draw them, all you’re doing is posting them. But they’re coming from different artists with different things to say. When you start to put them together into a big picture (along with cartoons and commentaries from other sources), you might begin to see what I’m getting at.
This particular cartoon presents the ideas in the most abstract manner I’ve seen so far. It’s much less a criticism of anything specific, but more of an amalgam of the ideas that have begun to be presented from those who have been critical. My fear is that when the ideas become too broad, it’s easy to begin to basically paint a picture that doesn’t necessarily exist. It’s an overblown game of “connect the arbitrarily related dots.”
Yes, by saying that there is a narrative in place, I too am connecting similar dots, but if prompted I’ll gladly put sources and a presentation together. I could easily begin such a task with a few of the comics displayed here. Still, I asked that the same be done from the other perspective first. đŸ˜€
I’d like to see real examples that support the idea of anti-government groups or individuals criticizing the government for not stepping in and saving us from the oil spill, and I’d like to see some real examples of those same people (or others) literally blaming Obama for the disaster.
I could go out and search for them, but I just want to make it clear that my intention was to start a discussion about it here.