<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fuzzy Math</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicalirony.com/2012/10/05/fuzzy-math/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicalirony.com/2012/10/05/fuzzy-math/</link>
	<description>Humor and Hypocrisy from the World of Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 03:33:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arthanyel</title>
		<link>http://politicalirony.com/2012/10/05/fuzzy-math/#comment-210568</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthanyel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 19:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalirony.com/?p=12222#comment-210568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Net revenues as a percentage, meaning no actual tax burden reduction for anyone - even though both Romney and Obama have said we need to reduce corporate taxes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Net revenues as a percentage, meaning no actual tax burden reduction for anyone &#8211; even though both Romney and Obama have said we need to reduce corporate taxes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arthanyel</title>
		<link>http://politicalirony.com/2012/10/05/fuzzy-math/#comment-210567</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthanyel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 19:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalirony.com/?p=12222#comment-210567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had seen a similar analysis that went further, assuming economic growth was not just the jobs (and the 12M he claimed) but that we looked at total GDP and assumed net revenues remained identical (which is also impossible).  With that in mind, to balance the budget assuming DRASTIC spending cuts in all discretionary spending other than education and defense (which he said he would not touch)  Romney would have to have the economy expand at just over 8% per year every year for 4 full years.

The only problem with that assumption is that it has NEVER HAPPENED.  And in order for it TO happen, it pre-supposes some new industry(ies) that produce something that can only be made in the US, has a high margin, and will be consumed by virtually every country on the planet.  And I can&#039;t even imagine what that would be, but I can tell you for sure it won&#039;t happen next year.

So the math just doesn&#039;t add up.  No matter how hard you try, it doesn&#039;t work.

So the Romney &quot;smaller slice of a bigger pie&quot; solution is using a pie in the sky.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had seen a similar analysis that went further, assuming economic growth was not just the jobs (and the 12M he claimed) but that we looked at total GDP and assumed net revenues remained identical (which is also impossible).  With that in mind, to balance the budget assuming DRASTIC spending cuts in all discretionary spending other than education and defense (which he said he would not touch)  Romney would have to have the economy expand at just over 8% per year every year for 4 full years.</p>
<p>The only problem with that assumption is that it has NEVER HAPPENED.  And in order for it TO happen, it pre-supposes some new industry(ies) that produce something that can only be made in the US, has a high margin, and will be consumed by virtually every country on the planet.  And I can&#8217;t even imagine what that would be, but I can tell you for sure it won&#8217;t happen next year.</p>
<p>So the math just doesn&#8217;t add up.  No matter how hard you try, it doesn&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>So the Romney &#8220;smaller slice of a bigger pie&#8221; solution is using a pie in the sky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TIM</title>
		<link>http://politicalirony.com/2012/10/05/fuzzy-math/#comment-210552</link>
		<dc:creator>TIM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 14:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalirony.com/?p=12222#comment-210552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DAMN THE MATHEMATICS, FULL SPEED AHEAD TO WONDERLAND WITH ALICE!

Yes, and 162.5 million jobs is easy to accomplish!.   If each of them worked three jobs, we&#039;d need only 54.17 million people to fill them all!.   Of course, not being able to sleep might impair their job performance somewhat.  Maybe they can catch up on the weekends.

I know!    Let&#039;s give jobs to illegal immigrants---we are being overrun with them anyway and we can always get more.    Or we could repeal the child labor laws (which repeal is probably buried in the Republican platform somewhere) and put the 8-year-olds back to work.  And there will be more kids anyway because of the Repugnant&#039;s stance on birth control.    You don&#039;t want to spend money on schools for them so put them to work!   And eliminate retirement----you work until you die on the job----then your body can be sent down to the local (privately owned) power plant and burned along with all that dirty coal to generate electricity (and profits for some plutocrat).    Does that sound too much &quot;Nazi-ish&quot; and even offensive?    I apologize but it perhaps does so because it&#039;s pointing to the kind of corporate fascism that the Republicans and the rich want to impose on the 99%   It will perhaps be more benign that what happened in Germany but will be fascism nonetheless.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DAMN THE MATHEMATICS, FULL SPEED AHEAD TO WONDERLAND WITH ALICE!</p>
<p>Yes, and 162.5 million jobs is easy to accomplish!.   If each of them worked three jobs, we&#8217;d need only 54.17 million people to fill them all!.   Of course, not being able to sleep might impair their job performance somewhat.  Maybe they can catch up on the weekends.</p>
<p>I know!    Let&#8217;s give jobs to illegal immigrants&#8212;we are being overrun with them anyway and we can always get more.    Or we could repeal the child labor laws (which repeal is probably buried in the Republican platform somewhere) and put the 8-year-olds back to work.  And there will be more kids anyway because of the Repugnant&#8217;s stance on birth control.    You don&#8217;t want to spend money on schools for them so put them to work!   And eliminate retirement&#8212;-you work until you die on the job&#8212;-then your body can be sent down to the local (privately owned) power plant and burned along with all that dirty coal to generate electricity (and profits for some plutocrat).    Does that sound too much &#8220;Nazi-ish&#8221; and even offensive?    I apologize but it perhaps does so because it&#8217;s pointing to the kind of corporate fascism that the Republicans and the rich want to impose on the 99%   It will perhaps be more benign that what happened in Germany but will be fascism nonetheless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://politicalirony.com/2012/10/05/fuzzy-math/#comment-210551</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 14:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalirony.com/?p=12222#comment-210551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From what I heard in the debate it sounds to me as working class people need to get some &quot;skin into the game&quot; by reducing deductions. Romney doesn&#039;t actually say which deductions will be cut, so my opinion is based on the &quot;47%&quot; remarks, and past rants on Fox.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I heard in the debate it sounds to me as working class people need to get some &#8220;skin into the game&#8221; by reducing deductions. Romney doesn&#8217;t actually say which deductions will be cut, so my opinion is based on the &#8220;47%&#8221; remarks, and past rants on Fox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
