I will admit that my viewpoint is that politics in general, and especially how it is practiced in this country, means that politicians (all politicians) will do things that I don’t like in order to get elected. That definitely includes Obama. But Republicans seem to have taken this to new extremes.

Am I more willing to forgive Obama for some of the things he does in order to get elected? Perhaps, since I am a pragmatist and a politician who agreed with me on everything probably could not get elected. Even Obama said that perfect should not be the enemy of the good.

But I definitely do not agree with the idea that having liberal thoughts makes one biased — believing in evolution or global man-made climate change is not a bias, since it is strongly supported by scientific evidence. If that is a bias, then there is no such thing as an unbiased opinion.

At the same time, I don’t think anyone contributing comments in here would automatically agree with everything Obama does (or think that Democrats are never wrong). We aren’t that stupid.

So stop trying to create a false equivalence, and I’ll stop giving you shit!

If there’s a wrong side (based on facts), they shouldn’t be telling us that one.

Or they should point out that it’s wrong.

Hassan, the problem is that there is no bias in asking someone to explain their position, nor is there bias in pointing out that they are dodging the question. That is JOURNALISM. Can I start saying she is a racist because she is grilling a white guy? A sexist because she is questioning a man?

If you want to see bias, take a look at your own posts where you decide prior to receiving information that she must be biased, and then demand proof to the contrary. THAT is bias.