<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Real Issues of the Future</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicalirony.com/2012/07/28/real-issues-of-the-future/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicalirony.com/2012/07/28/real-issues-of-the-future/</link>
	<description>Humor and Hypocrisy from the World of Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:55:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://politicalirony.com/2012/07/28/real-issues-of-the-future/#comment-207805</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 19:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalirony.com/?p=11901#comment-207805</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Except that too many people are battling for their financial lives and don&#039;t have time to check the facts after watching the plutocrat operated news source which provides the most &quot;entertainment&quot; value for their time. I&#039;ve said it before and I&#039;ll say it again, the only way to win the global warming debate is to agree it&#039;s pointless and shift the argument to national security and economic superiority, both of which favor renewable non-oil energy and products.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except that too many people are battling for their financial lives and don&#8217;t have time to check the facts after watching the plutocrat operated news source which provides the most &#8220;entertainment&#8221; value for their time. I&#8217;ve said it before and I&#8217;ll say it again, the only way to win the global warming debate is to agree it&#8217;s pointless and shift the argument to national security and economic superiority, both of which favor renewable non-oil energy and products.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
