Skip to content

If you can’t be right, be neo-right!


© Ruben Bolling

This is brilliant. In a non-reality-based frame, you never have to be wrong again!

Share

19 Comments

  1. Arrius wrote:

    I like this character. If it is not already, this should be a running gag.

    Friday, May 21, 2010 at 12:57 pm | Permalink
  2. someone else wrote:

    i agree with arrius.

    Friday, May 21, 2010 at 4:48 pm | Permalink
  3. edgar wrote:

    Just remember that the LORD would frown upon this.

    Friday, May 21, 2010 at 4:50 pm | Permalink
  4. edgar wrote:

    but the LORD favors the rebels in the TEA PARTY!

    Friday, May 21, 2010 at 4:51 pm | Permalink
  5. Anthony2816 wrote:

    Plagiarism. This is pure Glenn Beck.

    Monday, May 24, 2010 at 5:11 am | Permalink
  6. dBPC wrote:

    This is how everyone lives life.

    Tuesday, May 25, 2010 at 3:41 pm | Permalink
  7. It is rather funny, but it’s based on a stupid premise – just because there’s an accident in drilling for oil, should we halt all oil production immediately? Very clever though!

    Wednesday, May 26, 2010 at 10:46 am | Permalink
  8. Rick wrote:

    Well, this covers about half of the politicians…where is the rest? You got the Republitards, now how about the Democraps? Not very fair and balanced…they are ALL contemptible pieces of shite.

    Wednesday, May 26, 2010 at 12:09 pm | Permalink
  9. Iron Knee wrote:

    I don’t get it. Why does everyone think this comic is about Republicans?

    Wednesday, May 26, 2010 at 2:44 pm | Permalink
  10. pbd wrote:

    People love to criticize as they fill up their gas tanks with gasoline, its easy to be ignorant of where it comes from. Both parties grease their pockets with the “donations” from energy interests, the republicans have the oil companies and the democrats have the ethanol industry. You think ethanol reduces our carbon footprint? Do some research in the end it releases MORE CO2 than fossil fuels. Not to mention it raises the price of food.

    http://www.climatecentral.org/library/climopedia/corn_ethanol_can_cause_more_greenhouse_pollution_than_gasoline

    Wednesday, May 26, 2010 at 8:17 pm | Permalink
  11. BJ wrote:

    PBD that’s not the point. Lets start a revolution. If we captured less than 15% (which is how efficient solar panels are now) of the suns energy not absorbed in atmosphere/earth we could supply 2000x the power we currently use.

    Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 2:24 pm | Permalink
  12. Rightstar wrote:

    And if Obama’s people were at the oil rig inspecting it 10 days before it happened, and found no faults then it is GWB’s fault! Blame Bush!

    Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 3:43 pm | Permalink
  13. Marcus B. wrote:

    PBD: “You think ethanol reduces our carbon footprint?”

    Sigh… That’s really my least favorite “argument” in this debate. You know, nobody mentioned ethanol here. But whatever, right? I see this pattern so often…

    Person A (an eco-nazi, tree-hugging, polar bear-worshiping weirdo nutcase, with the preposterous idea that we should work towards a sustainable energy policy and a good world in the future) says something like:

    Our complete reliance on fossil fuels is bad. Our modern economy and infrastructure is based on the fact that we have plenty of oil, but there is only a finite amount. Also, taking oil out of the ground and using it causes numerous pollutants which kills wildlife and harms the environment – and this is quite besides the very real threat of climate change. So I think that it would be prudent to explore all the myriad of other options that are available to us if we’re willing to spend a little money on research, so that we can still have energy after our finite amount of fossil fuels run out, and so that we can breathe cleaner air and have cleaner water.

    Person B, a nice, honest realist who understands that there is no possible way to ever change the way humans live replies something along the lines of:

    You’re all so stupid! Look here, I can show you that ONE of the possible alternatives might not be so very good! Look! There, you see, that one alternative isn’t perfect. So of course we should not in any way explore ANY options. It’s all so obvious, suckers.

    Friday, May 28, 2010 at 8:58 pm | Permalink
  14. LawScholar wrote:

    Oh, yes, and the liberals never delude themselves. For instance, gun control really does reduce crime, and the areas with the strictest gun control laws have the safest streets, and the areas with the most available guns are the most violent.

    Er…bad example.

    For instance, the welfare and unemployment system is wonderful. People only use the system for however much money they need and then they get right back to work.

    Er…hmm…let me try again.

    Oh yes! Liberal politicians only want to bring good change and cars that run on dreams to America and conservative politicians are all grumpy and evil and want to halt society. Progressivism wants to give people all their needs. If people don’t have to work for their lifestyle, then naturally they will work even harder! Giving the government all the power has never had any historical precedent for going wrong. There is no WAY that a PROGRESSIVE politician like Barack Obama would go back on campaign promises about transparency in the government, full text Congressional bills being made publically available before they are voted on, or maintaining a balanced budget.

    Hm…striking out again…lookie there, both sides are completely full of shit. Do pardoned my shocked expression.

    Saturday, June 5, 2010 at 5:03 am | Permalink
  15. Chewy wrote:

    Sorry, I found this kind of stupid. I guess I missed whoever was being parodied.

    Friday, June 11, 2010 at 9:23 pm | Permalink
  16. Anonymous wrote:

    love it

    Monday, June 14, 2010 at 9:19 pm | Permalink
  17. lb wrote:

    “Sorry, I found this kind of stupid. I guess I missed whoever was being parodied.”

    Then you may be the object of the parody.

    Sunday, June 27, 2010 at 7:59 am | Permalink
  18. Luke wrote:

    Bush strickes again!

    /sarcasm

    Monday, August 9, 2010 at 10:53 am | Permalink
  19. Luke wrote:

    @LAWSCHOLAR, Hmmm…I don’t remember anything in the comic that said anything about Republicans.

    Monday, August 9, 2010 at 10:55 am | Permalink

2 Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. [...] another great comic about Nate, see “If you can’t be right, be neo-right“. Please Share / Save var a2a_config = a2a_config || {}; a2a_config.linkname="How to Run [...]

  2. Political Irony › Violence as a Game on Friday, January 21, 2011 at 1:51 am

    [...] old friend Nate shows us the way to fight violence. Please Share / Save  If you liked this, you might also [...]