<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McCain, who has made fighting pork the centerpiece of his campaign, votes for pork</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicalirony.com/2008/10/03/mccain-votes-for-pork/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicalirony.com/2008/10/03/mccain-votes-for-pork/</link>
	<description>Humor and Hypocrisy from the World of Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:54:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Iron Knee</title>
		<link>http://politicalirony.com/2008/10/03/mccain-votes-for-pork/#comment-4553</link>
		<dc:creator>Iron Knee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 18:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalirony.com/?p=1705#comment-4553</guid>
		<description>Exactly! What is needed is transparency and accountability. The problem is that Congress-critters can do earmarks without putting their name on them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly! What is needed is transparency and accountability. The problem is that Congress-critters can do earmarks without putting their name on them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TT</title>
		<link>http://politicalirony.com/2008/10/03/mccain-votes-for-pork/#comment-4547</link>
		<dc:creator>TT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 11:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalirony.com/?p=1705#comment-4547</guid>
		<description>Hey, one thing I do not understand is the great opposition to earmarks. I do understand that there is a need for you in the US to look at what you use these earmarks for, but I think it was said by one member in the House that if you eliminate earmarks you give the president all the power over what the national budget is used for. The question is then whether that is better?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, one thing I do not understand is the great opposition to earmarks. I do understand that there is a need for you in the US to look at what you use these earmarks for, but I think it was said by one member in the House that if you eliminate earmarks you give the president all the power over what the national budget is used for. The question is then whether that is better?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
